|
|
Vol. 3, No. 3 Fall 2000 |
|
Families Helping Children Reach Their Full Potential |
IN THIS ISSUE: CT FEAT Newsletter, Vol.3, No. 3, Fall 2000
Note: The content of this newsletter is, unless otherwise indicated, the property of Connecticut Families for Effective Autism Treatment, Inc. (CT FEAT) and is copyright protected. It may be used only with attribution. Copyright © 2000, CT FEAT, Inc.
IN THIS ISSUE:
* Lovaas on Lovaas. In a new article describing the UCLA Young Autism Project treatment model and the research supporting it, the legendary Ivar Lovaas demystifies "Lovaas therapy" and refutes its critics. (See pages 2-4)
* Mixing Business With Pleasure at the ASAT Conference. If there’s any chance you can schedule a vacation in sunny San Diego this upcoming March, you’ll want to make the March 8-10 ASAT conference one of your destinations. (See pages 4-5)
* Autism Services: The State of the State. This first in a series of annual lectures on autism planned by the Eden Institute featured an array of interesting speakers, including Michael Powers, Deborah Richards, Roger Frant and David Holmes. (See pages 5-8)
* River Street Opens Locust Street School. This past summer, the River Street Autism Program opened ABA classrooms for preschool (ages 3 to 5) and transition (ages 6 to 8) students. (See pages 8-9)
*
Carbone Comes to Connecticut. On January 5th and 6th, the renowned Vincent Carbone will present his popular two-day workshop on "Teaching Communication Skills to Children and Adults With Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities." (See pages 9-10)* Connecticut Center for Child Development (CCCD) 2001 Lecture Series. "Teaching children to follow directions" and "Increasing spontaneous language" are two of the seven topics in the 2001 edition of this popular free lecture series. (See page 10)
* Facing Autism, With Lynn Hamilton. A fellow parent has written a hopeful and helpful guide to the issues that today’s parents are most concerned about. (See pages 11-12)
*
CT FEAT Parent Resource Meeting on January 28, 2001 These quarterly meetings provide parents with an opportunity to network with each other in a confidential setting. (See page 16)* Canadians Rule! In a July 2000 decision, the British Columbia Supreme Court found that "it is beyond debate that the appropriate treatment [for autism] is ABA or early intensive behavioral intervention" and the failure of the government to pay for this "medically necessary" treatment constitutes discrimination. (See page 12-13)
* Two Ways to Support CT FEAT. Many parents and professionals express their appreciation for the work of CT FEAT and ask how they can support our organization. Here are two ways. (See page 13)
* Subscribe to FEAT Online. The FEAT Daily Online Newsletter is a unique and indispensable source of information about what’s happening in the autism world. (See page 14)
* SERC’s Focus on Autism Series. One of the more interesting offerings this year is "Developing Skills in Practical Discrete Trial Instruction and Programming for Preschoolers With Autism" presented by staff from the Douglass Developmental Disabilities Center at Rutgers University. (See page 14)
* UCONN Recruiting Research Participants. Deborah Fein, Ph.D., and her colleagues are recruiting participants for a variety of ongoing and upcoming research projects. (See page 14-15)* Parents Opening Resource Center. Two dedicated and energetic parents have secured funding to open the state’s first statewide autism resource center. (See page 15)
| BACK
to TOP of PAGE
|
LOVAAS ON LOVAAS (B.C.) Is there such a thing as "Lovaas" therapy? How does it differ from other intervention programs based on Applied Behavior Analysis? (ABA)? Why has there been so much misrepre-sentation of the Lovaas research? Ivar Lovaas addresses these issues and more in his recent article Clarifying Comments on the UCLA Young Autism Project. (The full 55 page report is available, along with other related research and reports, at CT FEAT’s web site: www.ctfeat.org.) |
Lovaas and His Critics
Lovaas is the professor at the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) who pioneered the use of intensive behavioral intervention to treat young children with autistic disorder. In the 1980s and 90s, he and his colleagues published research demonstrating that significant numbers of children receiving behavioral treatment were able to attain normal levels of intellectual and social functioning.
The Surgeon General of the United States has described the Lovaas research as a "well-designed study." Nonetheless, it has been extensively criticized by promoters of different autism treatment models. Some of these critics have found lucrative careers testifying as expert witnesses in due process hearings against parents seeking intensive ABA treatment for their children.
In the course of refuting his critics, Lovaas quotes extensively from their writings and testimony. Veterans of due process proceedings will be familiar with many of these individuals: e.g. Schopler and Mesibov of TEACCH; Gresham and MacMillan; and B.J. Freeman, among others.
Some of their criticism of Lovaas so distorts the research on behavioral intervention as to border on bad faith.
It’s satisfying to see these misrepresentations so effectively rebutted. But it still makes for depressing reading. It’s a reminder of the extent to which these efforts to discredit Lovaas’ research have served to delay the day when all children on the autism spectrum will have access to effective treatment.
Clinic-based vs. Workshop-based Services
The UCLA Young Autism Project (YAP) offers two kinds of consultative services: clinic-based and workshop-based. In both models, the therapy is delivered in the home setting.
The principal difference between the two is that clinic-based services provide much more quality control. In the workshop model, families employ the tutors and the consultant visits every six to twelve weeks to provide oversight. In the clinic model, the clinic hires the staff and provides them with frequent and extensive training and weekly supervision.
Not surprisingly, clinic-based services achieve much better outcomes for their clients, with results similar to those documented in the published research (where 9 out of 19 children, or about 47%, attained normal levels of functioning).
Only about 20% of YAP’s workshop clients achieve this outcome. Of course, even this lower success rate is much higher than anything reported by other autism treatment models, including so called "eclectic" models which purport to offer an "ABA" component.
Unfortunately, due to the enormous resources required, clinic-based services are available only to the very few. Most families must rely on the workshop model.
Unless professionals have received a very specific and detailed training protocol from the UCLA YAP, they are not competent to provide therapy based on the Lovaas research. Unfortunately, there are legions of people who have spent brief periods at UCLA (as students or therapists), and even some who have never trained there at all, who misleadingly claim to be offering "Lovaas" therapy.
The YAP Model: Home-Based Treatment
Lovaas’ article describes the YAP model in some detail. Some of these features may be unfamiliar to parents who mistakenly think that their child is receiving an "ABA" program based on the "Lovaas research."
For example, the principal treatment setting for a YAP program, whether based on the clinic or the workshop model, is the home. "Parents and other adults conduct treatment during the early months of intervention and the child is integrated into community settings such as typical preschools with age-appropriate peers within the first year of intervention." (emphasis added)
A variety of behavioral methods are used to teach every aspect of "normal" functioning, including: language, emotional, intellectual, play and social behaviors. "Discrete trials are used in behavioral treatment but comprise only a portion of such treatment and are largely used during its beginning phases."
How Much And For How Long?
The UCLA/YAP model puts tremendous emphasis on treatment intensity. Those "best outcome" children who achieved "normal functioning" received an average of 40 hours per week of one-on-one instruction over an approximately two to three-year period.
Some have speculated that children could make similar kinds of progress with fewer treatment hours. Lovaas emphatically disputes this claim. "If we had evidence that 30 hours or less a week would generate the same outcome, then we would have been able to serve that many more children, which would be the goal of any treatment agency."
What About Children Who Don’t Attain Normal Functioning?
The majority of children in the Lovaas study did not achieve normal functioning and were expected to require ongoing treatment throughout their lives. But almost all of them increased their overall intellectual and adaptive functioning substantially.
Lovaas believes that "unless the child achieves normal functioning by the age of seven, it is likely that the child will need life-long behavioral intervention (although perhaps less intensively than the forty hours per week given to preschoolers in the UCLA model) in order to prevent loss of treatment gains and maintain progress." He also speculates that many of these children might additionally benefit from "new and different interventions that have yet to be discovered."
Why Do Children Respond Differently to the Treatment?
Children diagnosed with autism appear to form two relatively distinct groups which respond differently to behavioral treatment. According to Lovaas, "One group (‘auditory learners’) acquires vocal language which helps predict best outcome. The remaining children [‘visual learners’] experience significant problems in the vocal language program...Our failure to teach vocal imitation is a strong predictor of limited progress in treatment."
Lovaas isn’t claiming that children who achieve good verbal imitation skills within the first three months of treatment necessarily will attain best outcomes (i.e. "normal" functioning). But their overall prognosis usually is better than children who don’t acquire this ability within that time frame.
What Does the Autism Diagnosis Mean?
In some ways, the diagnosis of autism can obscure more than it clarifies. It seems to imply that there exists some underlying organizing force that ties all of the associated behaviors ("symptoms") together.
The search for this "underlying force" has given rise to various "theories" of autism. Many of these unproven theories have led to treatments which are ineffective at best, and harmful at worst.
Lovaas is highly skeptical that there exists any single explanatory theory to account for autism. Though autism may look the same, in fact "similar behaviors may have different causes and therefore may not...respond in a similar way to the same intervention." From that perspective, the most effective approach is to ameliorate the symptoms on a behavior by behavior basis.
![]()
As Lovaas observes, "There seems to be some consensus building that there are many causes of autism; hence there are likely to be many and different kinds of autism, requiring different kinds of treatment and preventative measures."
In 1999, Lovaas colleague Tristam Smith published a survey of 12 peer-reviewed treatment outcome studies on early intervention for children with autism - the only such studies published since 1980. Programs based on behavior analysis produced the best results. In addition to these outcome studies, there are more than 550 peer-reviewed studies supporting the effectiveness of behavior analytic treatment approaches for teaching skills to this population. (See Smith’s article at the CT FEAT web site.)
Implications: One Parent’s View
Parents will want to carefully consider the information Lovaas has provided. The lesson I draw is that treatment choices should take account of the enormous range of abilities and deficits found among the autism population and that no single type of ABA program best serves everyone.
As we all know, some individuals with autism have the capacity to speak. Some do not. Some have the capacity to develop "normal" cognitive skills. Some do not. Some children respond dramatically to the best available treatment. Others make only modest gains.
While there are certain commonalities among ABA based treatment programs, the differences among them are as varied as the individuals they treat. To cite just two well-known examples, the treatment models developed at the Princeton Child Development Institute (PCDI) and at the Eden Institute differ not only from the Lovaas model, but also from each other.
Children probably will respond more favorably to one kind of ABA program vs. another depending on the "kind of autism" they have. But how are we to know which kind of program best fits which kind of child?
Lovaas has provided detailed information about the UCLA/YAP model. He’s also told us what he knows about which children are likely to benefit the most from it - i.e. the so called "auditory learners."
Like most children with autism, these auditory learners usually struggle with language and are drawn to visual stimuli. But they have the capacity to become strong auditory learners - a skill essential for unsupported success in the mainstream classroom and many other aspects of "normal" functioning.
Parents would appreciate similar candor from other ABA programs regarding what they do, how they do it, which kinds of kids they are targeting, and what kinds of outcomes they achieve.
With this kind of information, parents will be in a better position to choose the treatment that is best calculated to help their individual child reach his or her potential.v
|
|
Mixing Business With Pleasure At The ASAT Conference
|
Many Nutmeggers will be yearning for a trip to sunny California by the time March rolls around. For those of you fortunate enough to actually make such a trip, here’s an opportunity to mix some business with pleasure.
One of the upcoming year’s best conferences will take place in San Diego on March 8th through 10th, 2001, when the Association for Science in Autism Treatment (ASAT) convenes its Conference 2001: International Conference on Science in Autism Treatment.
San Diego, home to a world famous zoo, also is within easy driving distance of two popular amusement parks: Lego Land, at about a half-hour’s drive, and Disneyland, at about an hour-and-a-half.
![]()
|
Autism Services: The State Of The State (Sue Frost Bennett)
|
![]() |
As the coordinator for the CT FEAT Hotline, I’ve spoken with hundreds of parents and professionals. Those conversations have left me very concerned about the paucity of autism services available in Connecticut.
So when I heard that the New Jersey-based Eden Institute was holding a conference focused on Autism Services in Connecticut, I eagerly signed up.
In particular, I hoped to come away with a better understanding of why our state compares so unfavorably with other nearby states - like Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Jersey and Pennsylvania - when it comes to the availability of ABA-based services.
The conference took place on September 28, 2000, at Eden’s Wawa Education and Retreat Center in Chaplin--a beautiful (and remote!) setting in northeast CT. This lovely facility also is used for summer vacation programs for Eden clients.
Most of the approximately 50 people in attendance were administrators and staff from school systems and early intervention programs.
I had the pleasure of sitting with a wonderfully devoted Birth to Three worker. I also enjoyed meeting David Cormier, who recently has been named as the new autism consultant at the Special Education Resource Center (SERC) - a position that four different people have held over the last four years.
The conference featured five presenters:
1) David L. Holmes, Ed.D., the founding director of the Eden Family of Services (based in Princeton, NJ);
2) Deborah Richards, MS, CCC, a Regional Manager for the CT Birth to Three System;
3) Roger D. Frant, Ph.D., an educational consultant with the Bureau of Special Education and Pupil Services for the state of CT;
4) Diane Twachtman-Cullen, Ph.D., CCC-SLP, an autism consultant; and
5) Michael Powers, Psy.D., a pediatric psychologist specializing in the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of individuals with autism and related disabilities.
Roger Frant On the State’s Role
Roger Frant and Deborah Richards joined together in making the keynote address "Autism Services in Connecticut." Frant has compiled data indicating that the prevalence rate of autism in CT is increasing. Currently, approximately one out of every 530 students in grades K-12 has a diagnosis of autism.
Frant discussed the difficulties inherent in compiling reliable data. For example, until the age of six, children don’t need to have any specific diagnostic label to be eligible for services. Hence, many parents and schools prefer to leave the child "unlabeled" until that time. There also is the increasing phenomenon of older children being diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) after previously being categorized under some nonspecific learning disability.
Frant also talked about the need for better quality services in CT and some of the steps that SERC is taking to increase training opportunities. These include sponsorship of the "Focus on Autism" series (see page 14) and facilitating some "consortium" trainings.
These consortium trainings involve several towns coming together to undertake a more in-depth kind of training than the more customary one-day workshop. For example, University of Kansas autism consultant Brenda Smith Myles, who specializes in Asperger’s syndrome and older children, recently conducted a six-session training with the towns of Hartford, Cromwell, Wallingford and Simsbury. Each town sent eight staff persons to the training.
I was relieved to learn that SERC has decided against reissuing the outdated Report
of the Connecticut Task Force on Issues for the Education of Children With
Autism (hereafter referred to as the Report).
It’s true that the Report has a good section describing the eight essential components of an appropriate education: earliest involvement; parent involvement; a focus on social interaction and communication; intensive programming of at least 25-30 hours per week; direct teaching within a structured setting; programming for generalization; specifically trained personnel; and planned integration with typical peers. According to Frant, this information has provided judges in due process cases with good guidance about the educational needs of this population.
Another virtue of the Report is that it alerted schools to the need for more intensive services, not only during the regular school year but also for extended services during the summer.
However, the rest of the Report is replete with educational recommendations that disregard scientific evidentiary standards. Connecticut clearly needs a more balanced and scientific report, like those recently produced by the states of New York and Maine.
[Editor’s Note: Those reports are available at the CT FEAT web site (
www.ctfeat.org). For a fuller analysis of the CT Report’s strengths and weaknesses, see the online version of the Winter 2000 edition of the CT FEAT Newsletter.]Deborah Richards on Birth to Three’s Role
The CT Birth to Three System, which is comprised of 39 separate providers, annually services approximately 7,000 children with a variety of developmental problems.
I was especially pleased to learn that Birth to Three has begun to move in the direction of encouraging parents to have their child diagnosed. Until recently, their policy was to tell parents that an ASD diagnosis would have no impact on the services available.
Now there is greater appreciation of the importance of the earliest possible diagnosis. According to Deborah Richards, "it’s an ethical responsibility" for service providers to tell parents what the symptoms mean.
To that end, some Birth to Three programs have begun using the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT), developed by Dr. Marianne Barton and her colleagues at the University of Connecticut. The M-CHAT is designed to detect autism as early as 18 months. (See the Spring/Summer 2000 edition of the CT FEAT Newsletter for more information about the M-CHAT.)
Birth to Three has come to recognize that children with ASD need, in Richard’s words, more "intensive engagement." Practically speaking, this means that ASD clients are more likely to receive 15 to 20 hours of services, rather than the 3 to 5 hours that is typical for non-ASD clients.
The transition into the local school system at age three can be fraught with difficulty. Often the children scarcely have begun treatment with one provider when they are obliged to adjust to another. Both Michael Powers and Deborah Richards agreed that young children would be better served by a "Birth to Six" system, such as exists in some other states.
Birth to Three and Floor Time
I was somewhat concerned to realize, from Richard’s remarks, the extent to which a strong bias in favor of Stanley Greenspan’s "Floor Time" (also known as the "Developmental, Individual Difference Relationship" or "DIR" model) continues to exist at Birth to Three. While Richards recognizes that some component of ABA should be used with all ASD children, she believes that the Greenspan model "makes sense."
As I have learned from the numerous parents with whom I’ve spoken over the years, most of the Birth to Three providers tend to have a "play therapy" kind of background. This evidently inclines them strongly towards the Greenspan model, which fits better with their existing skills than would an ABA-based model. It also doesn’t require them to undergo extensive retraining.
Realizing that the Greenspan approach has a data problem (i.e. failure to demonstrate its effectiveness), Birth to Three has been working with Floortime consultant Rebecca Klaw to try to develop a data system that will measure the progress that they think is taking place. This past summer, 40 Birth to Three System staff participated in an extensive training by Klaw and some of them will be going to Pittsburgh, where she is located, to be mentored by her.
Michael Powers on Program Development
Picking up on a theme alluded to by other speakers, Michael Powers talked about some of the disincentives that school systems encounter when they undertake setting up good ABA programs. The biggest problems are budgetary ones.
While it’s true that the state reimburses the towns for some portion of their special education expenses, this money is not designated as "education" money. In most of Connecticut’s 169 towns, this money goes into the town’s general funds - i.e. it’s not specifically targeted for the education budget.
Parents might want to consider lobbying their town governments to change this system, as a few towns have done, so that the money goes directly back to the education budget.
Another problem faced by towns offering ABA programs is the prospect that families may relocate to them for the specific purpose of obtaining services. This can drive up costs and jeopardize the political will to continue making the expenditures necessary to provide quality services.
With his usual eloquence, Powers spoke movingly about the special difficulties faced by many urban school districts. These areas are especially lacking in appropriate services for ASD children. Powers suggested that some sort of "Head Start" program for the youngest children might be in order.
According to Powers, the extraordinary dearth of qualified ABA consultants located in Connecticut has made us overly reliant on out-of-state consultants. And, in the absence of a recognized credentialing standard for autism professionals, school administrators and parents find it difficult to distinguish those who are competent from those who are not.
Powers would like to see the development of a statewide, competency-based training model. Such a model would emphasize performance feedback training and mentoring.
David Holmes on the Eden Model
When it comes to the availability of ABA services, New Jersey today appears to be a veritable paradise compared to Connecticut. But that was not always the case. Twenty-five years ago, when David Holmes founded the Eden Institute, New Jersey suffered from the same kind of service scarcity that prevails in Connecticut today.
Evidently, part of the purpose of the "Eden Lecture Series on Autism" is to raise Eden’s profile in CT and make Connecticut school systems aware of its availability as a service provider.
Eden’s special focus appears to be on the more severely impaired end of the autism spectrum, for which they have developed their unique model of "life span services." For this population, Holmes "starts planning for a child’s vocational training from the age of 18 months." However, he usually does not share his thoughts about the child’s prospects with the "mommies and daddies" because it’s such a "fragile time" for them. Holmes also indicated that he thought that "center-based" programs were better than "home-based" ones for the kind of student typically served by Eden.
Contrasting the Eden and Lovaas Models
There are many differences between the kind of "ABA program" offered by Eden and the kind described in the Lovaas research (see Lovaas on Lovaas on pages 2-4.)
Unlike the Lovaas model, which is always home-based, the Eden model is implemented in "centers" (e.g. classrooms). Eden’s services are also much less intensive - less than half of the hours provided in a Lovaas program. Not surprisingly, given these perceptions about its students’ abilities, Eden’s goals are much less ambitious. You can read more about the model in Holmes’ book, Autism Through the Lifespan: The Eden Model (1998).
Diane Twachtman-Cullen on Inclusion
Diane Twachtman-Cullen presented some common sense, and generally widely accepted, observations about the goals of inclusive education and the "best practices" involved in achieving them.
She also alluded to her well-known role as an "expert witness" for school systems in some recent due process cases. Twachtman-Cullen stated that she didn’t "much like due process cases," despite her frequent involvement in them.
Twachtman-Cullen also described her various books, all of which she had brought with her to sell.
Parental Perspective
The good news is that there is a growing recognition of how poorly Connecticut serves our autism spectrum population, particularly when compared to other states of similar wealth and education.
In some states, like Pennsylvania, the state Department of Education has taken a major leadership role in developing the availability of ABA-based services in the school systems. Unfortunately, I can’t say that our state’s department appears ready to address vigorously this critical need.
Connecticut needs to develop a locally based professional class with the education, training, and supervised clinical experience necessary to deliver bona fide ABA programs. CT’s Department of Education could and should play an important role in achieving this.
There are lots of good ideas out there, generated by people like Dr. Powers, and some successful state models to look at. But more political momentum will be required to make the kind of profound changes that are needed. And that momentum will have to come, most of all, from the parent community. v

FROM YOU!
CT FEAT welcomes feedback from our readers regarding the contents of the CT FEAT Newsletter. Are you enjoying it? How might it be improved? We invite your comments and suggestions.
Please send your ideas to the newsletter’s editor at CT FEAT, P.O. Box 388, Ellington, CT 06029-0388, or email Beth at ctfeat@ctfeat.org. If you’d like us to consider publishing your remarks as a "letter to the editor," please include a daytime phone number where you can be reached. v

This past summer, the River Street Autism Program opened classrooms for PRESCHOOL (3-5 years) and TRANSITION (6-8 years) students. The new Locust Street School is located - you guessed it - on Locust Street in Hartford.
Using Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) and discrete trial training methodology, the Locust Street program provides intensive school-based programming to those students who can’t take advantage of a home-based program, or who may be transitioning out of a home-based setting prior to entering a local school.
Clinical supervision is provided by Kathy Dyer, Ph.D., CCC-SLP, BCBA (Board Certified Behavior Analyst), a noted expert in the field of autism. Instruction is provided by trained therapists under the direction of Certified Special Education Teachers. Curriculum supervision is provided by Erica Roest , M.Ed., Program Director of the River Street Autism Program.
This intensive intervention program is highly individualized and can be crafted
to meet the requirements of an IEP with respect to length of day
(up to 8 hours) and length of year (240+ days). Combination programs
blending on-site and home-based instruction also are available.
For more details about this new program, contact Tom Parvenski at 601 River Street, Windsor, CT 06095; 860-298-9079; or via email at riverstsch@crec.org. Mr. Parvenski directs the River Street School which offers a variety of educational programs for individuals with autism and other learning impairments, including some that are ABA-based. The River Street Autism Program is a division of the River Street School, which is itself a part of the Capitol Regional Education Council (CREC). v
|
Carbone Comes to Connecticut (Rich Irwin)
|
![]() |
On January 5 & 6, 2001, Vincent Carbone, Ed.D. will present his popular two-day workshop on teaching verbal language to children and adults with autism. This much anticipated event will take place at the Radisson Hotel in Cromwell, Connecticut.
Carbone has been in great demand on the conference circuit during this past year. He gets very positive word-of-mouth for both his presentation style and his content. Conference goers report that he is a lively, entertaining presenter who makes great use of video clips.
Participants in the workshop will learn:
The workshop will include the recommended teaching procedures for children who have no formal communication skills to children who are near conversational speakers.
Carbone’s Professional Background
Carbone has over 25 years of experience designing programs for persons with developmental disabilities. He is a Florida Certified Behavior Analyst whose behavior analytic research has been published in several peer-reviewed journals.
His research and clinical expertise is in the area of functional assessment and implementation of teaching programs for persons with autism. He has a special emphasis upon teaching verbal behavior to the most difficult to instruct learners.
The DTT-NET Methodology
Carbone promotes the teaching methods developed by his fellow behavior analysts, James Partington, Ph.D, and Mark Sundberg, Ph.D. These methods are based on the work of noted behaviorist B.F. Skinner.
This methodology has been referred to as "discrete trial training, natural environment teaching" (dtt-net). The focus is on the use of intensive discrete trial training but in a more naturalistic setting, with more natural presentations and using more naturalistic reinforcers.
Sundberg and Partington’s innovative assessment and intervention strategies are outlined in their book, Teaching Language to Children with Autism or Other Developmental Disabilities. For an extensive review of this book, see the Fall 1999 edition of the CT FEAT Newsletter, available online at
www.ctfeat.org.Since some of their material is quite technical, Sundberg and Partington frequently conduct workshops to train people to use the specialized instruments and techniques they have developed.
Carbone’s workshops also train people to use the Sundberg and Partington manual. In addition, he provides his own set of "guided notes."
A description of the one-day version of Carbone’s workshop appeared in the Spring/Summer 2000 edition of this newsletter (available online) and provides some preview of what you can expect.
![]()
Teaching Communication Skills to Children and Adults With Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities
will be held on Friday and Saturday, January 5 & 6, 2001, from 8:30 to 4:30 at the Radisson Hotel and Conference Center in Cromwell, Connecticut.The registration fee of $225.00 includes the Sundberg & Partington manual, which is used throughout the presentation. If you already own the manual, the registration fee is $195. The registration fee must be received by December 15, 2000.
The Radisson is offering a special rate of $69.00 per night, available until December 12th, if the "Carbone Seminar" is mentioned.
There is a conference brochure and registration form enclosed within this CT FEAT Newsletter. If you need additional registration forms, you can obtain them at Carbone’s web site, www.JerichoSchool.org, under "Workshops." v

LECTURE SERIES
The Connecticut Center for Child Development (CCCD) will be offering another in its popular series of free lectures on educating children with autism and related disabilities. The upcoming series will begin in January of 2001, and run until June.
Interested individuals are invited to attend on a first come, first served basis. Seating is limited and early reservations are recommended. CCCD is located on 925 Bridgeport Avenue in Milford, Connecticut. Further information about CCCD can be obtained at their web site:
www.cccdinc.org.To make reservations, call Holly Sickles at (203) 882-8810, extension 10. Due to space limitations, please notify CCCD of cancellations as early as possible so that others can be accommodated.
January 17, 2001, 7:00 P.M.
Lecture #1: Applied Behavior Analysis: What It Is And Is Not
Jodi Mazaleski M.S., CBA and
Patricia Fitzsimons M.S., CBA
February 7, 2001, 7:00 P.M.
Lecture #2: Teaching Children to Follow Instructions
Patricia Fitzsimons M.S., CBA
February 28, 2001, 7:00 P.M.
Lecture #3: Developing Problem Solving Skills & Increasing Language During Play
Jodi Mazaleski M.S., CBA; and
Customizing Systems of Reinforcement
Heather Cramer, CABA
March 21, 2001, 7:00 P.M.
Lecture #4: Increasing Spontaneous Language
Patricia Fitzsimons M.S., CBA and
Leslie Michniewicz M.S., CBA
April 11, 2001, 7:00 P.M.
Lecture #5: Visitor’s Day at Night
Jan Calabro M.S., and Cresse Snyder
May 2, 2001, 7:00 P.M.
Lecture #6: Utilizing Behavioral Strategies at Home & in the Community
Judy Palazzo M.S., and Suzanne Letso
June 6, 2001, 7:00 P.M.
Lecture #7: Using Augmentative Communication Systems
Christine Pornper M.A., CCC-SLP and
Judy Palazzo M.S. v
|
FACING AUTISM, WITH LYNN HAMILTON (Book Review by B.C.)
|
![]() |
Lynn Hamilton has written the book that she wishes had been available five years ago, when her son was diagnosed with autism.
In Facing Autism: Giving Parents Reasons for Hope and Guidance for Help, Hamilton navigates the bewildering array of popular autism treatments - providing comprehensive descriptions of everything from Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) to secretin.
She explains the theories underlying these interventions and provides practical information regarding how to pursue them: e.g. the names of laboratories that conduct certain kinds of medical testing; recommended cook books for implementing the gluten-free/casein-free (G-F/C-F) diet, etc.
Hamilton has first-hand experience with most of the current autism treatments. These include virtually all of the "biological" treatments (e.g. special diets, supplements, etc.), most of which she recommends at least trying.Even where her child didn’t derive any obvious benefit from a treatment (as with Auditory Integration Training - AIT), she remains open minded about its possible benefit for others. In assessing the possible worth of most treatments, she relies heavily on the anecdotal reports (positive or negative) of other parents, as well as her own child’s experience.
One of Hamilton’s principal sources for the book is psychologist Bernard Rimland, director of the Autism Research Institute (ARI). According to Hamilton, contacting the ARI is one of the "first ten things" parents should do following diagnosis.
Rimland is similarly enthusiastic about Hamilton, stating in a promotional blurb for the book that "If you can only buy one guidebook on autism, Facing Autism is the one to get!"
The Importance of Applied Behavior Analysis
Despite her enthusiasm for such a wide array of treatments, Hamilton emphasizes that ABA played the most important role in her son’s treatment. "I credit ABA for the majority of Ryan’s dramatic improvement." Her chapter on ABA is practical, informative and well written.
In her emphasis on the importance of ABA, Hamilton quotes Victoria Beck, a parent who is widely credited with discovering the potential benefit of secretin treatment for some children with autism and gastrointestinal disease. In addition to his secretin infusions, Beck’s son received 35 hours per week of "excellent ABA therapy." "Without the ABA education, even the secretin would not allow him to be the spontaneous, joyful, and bright child that he is."
According to Hamilton, "Some parents shy away from the long-haul approach of ABA, opting instead for the minute chance their child will experience a miraculous recovery with some obscure treatment." Hamilton stresses that, whatever additional treatments you may pursue for your child, it’s essential to have a good quality ABA program in place.
A Message of Hope
Parents will be buoyed by Hamilton’s positive "can do" attitude. It’s a welcome contrast to the negative tone of too many autism guides, such as Charles Hart’s depressing A Parent’s Guide to Autism (1993).
No doubt, her familiarity with Hart’s grim book made her recognize the need for a better "parent’s guide." She recalls her dismay at reading Hart, who "compared behavioral programs with horse training, with therapists yelling at the children or spraying them in the face with water."
Experimental Interventions
One shortcoming of Hamilton’s book is its failure to empha-size the experimental nature of many of the therapies that she en-dorses.
To take just one example, there is no scientific basis for the sweeping claim that "most of us can expect to see positive results" from the G-F/C-F diet. Most of the "symptoms" allegedly caused by gluten and casein - such as a strong desire for a narrow range of preferred foods, appearing "spaced out," sleeping problems, sound sensitivity, and temper tantrums - are common among children on the autism spectrum, regardless of whether they have any food allergies.
|
The content of this newsletter is, unless otherwise indicated, the property of Connecticut Families for Effective Autism Treatment, Inc. (CT FEAT) and is copyright protected. It may be used only with attribution. Copyright © 2000, CT FEAT, Inc. |
![]()
Though promoted by Bernard Rimland and a small group of medical doctors, only a very tiny minority within the medical community endorses these practices.
Rimland’s continued support for AIT, despite the findings in various controlled studies that it has no effect, suggests that he may not attach a lot of importance to scientific validation. Nonetheless, it is incumbent upon the DAN enthusiasts to continue to develop the protocol, with an emphasis on controlled trials and publications in peer-reviewed journals.
Future Directions for Biomedical Research
The Lovaas research demonstrates what many of us know from our personal experience: that a sizeable minority of children can attain normal functioning without any dietary or biological interventions. But as Lovaas colleague Tristam Smith wrote in a recent survey of treatment research:
Because autism is biological in origin, learning-based interventions, which are now the mainstay of treatment, will sooner or later need to be integrated with findings in biomedical research....children who [remain autistic] despite receiving the best available treatment may constitute a more homogeneous sample for studying associated biomedical problems than would a general group of children with autism.
Parents whose children fail to progress satisfactorily can hardly be blamed for leaving no stone unturned. It may ultimately be proven that some of these treatments help some subset of children. We can only hope so.
But one worries that the amount of time, effort and expense involved with some of these treatments may detract from the family’s focus on providing a high quality behavioral intervention program. Even under the best of circumstances, implementing such a program can be very challenging and demanding.
Of course, this evidently wasn’t a problem for the ever buoyant and energetic Hamilton. She not only pursued just about every imaginable treatment. She even managed to write a wonderful book about her experience. v
CANADIANS RULE!
The July 2000 decision of the British Columbia Supreme Court in Auton et. al. vs. the Attorney General of British Columbia is the strongest Canadian legal precedent to date in favor of intensive ABA treatment for kids with autism.
The court found that early and intensive ABA is a "medically necessary" service that must be funded by the government. Its refusal to fund this treatment "discriminates against the petitioners…by failing to …[provide] effective treatment for autism. It is beyond debate that the appropriate treatment is ABA or early intensive behavioral intervention." (emphasis added)
The decision, available at the FEAT BC web site at www.featbc.org, is quite lengthy but well worth reading. It features testimony from a stellar line up of expert witnesses, including psychologists John McEachin, and Tristam Smith (co-authors, together with Ivar Lovaas, of the 1993 study Long-term outcome for children with autism who received early intensive behavioral treatment), and James Mulick (co-author, with John Jacobson and Gina Green, of Cost-benefit estimates for early intensive behavioral intervention for young children with autism). Also appearing, in his familiar role as a witness for the government, was Frank Gresham, a professor at the UCLA School of Education.
The case was brought by a group of parents that included
Sabrina Freeman, president of FEAT of British Columbia. Freeman is well known in
the ABA community as the author of the highly regarded Teach Me Language manual.
v
|
Two Ways To Support CT FEAT (Mike Bennett, President)
|
![]() |
With this edition of the CT FEAT Newsletter, we continue our tradition of sharing timely, practical, and important informa- tion for parents of children with autism and related disorders.
Through this newsletter, which now reaches nearly 1000 parents and professionals, as well as through our other activities (e.g. telephone hotline, web site, listserv, parent meetings, information packet and special events), CT FEAT has reached hundreds of families with our message of hope.
Many parents express their appreciation for the work of CT FEAT and ask how they can support our organization. Here are two ways:
1. Make a contribution to our annual appeal.
In a short time, you will be receiving a letter asking for your support. Please give thoughtful consideration to the needs of CT FEAT and consider including us in your "end of year" charitable giving.
2. Support CT FEAT through the United Way
Many corporations, school systems and other organizations will sponsor United Way Campaign Drives. This presents a great opportunity for CT FEAT to receive more funding.
I would like to ask you to consider allocating all or some of your United Way donation to CT FEAT as well as asking friends and family (anywhere in the United States) to do the same.
The United Way will distribute pledge cards. On the pledge card you will be asked to make a contribution and given the option of directing your dollars to the United Way general fund or to a specific organization. CT FEAT is not listed on the pledge card but is eligible to receive your contribution. All you need to do is complete the card and write in CT FEAT as the organization you wish to receive your contribution. United Way will then forward your donation to CT FEAT.
Please write the following on the pledge card:
CT FEAT
P.O. Box 388
Ellington, CT 06029-0388
Phone (860) 571-3888
With your help, CT FEAT will have a sound financial base to continue future work to benefit you and our larger autism family. Thank you! v
| Subscribe to FEAT ONLINE | ![]() |
The FEAT Daily Online Newsletter is a unique and indispensable source of information about what’s happening in the autism world. It’s published by Sacramento FEAT, a parent-run, not-for-profit, all-volunteer organization.
FEAT Online’s editors monitor a half-dozen of the larger autism-related email lists. They also comb the larger dailies and websites for important news and developments.
The newsletter contains the latest on just about every conceivable topic, from cutting edge medical and neurological research to issues affecting legal and political advocacy. They also prepare a monthly nationwide conference listing.
This free newsletter arrives in two or three postings per day. No overstuffing of your email box! If you want to join the more than 11,000 parents and professionals who already subscribe to FEAT Online, go to: www.feat.org/FEATNews. v
|
|
SERC’S FOCUS ON AUTISM SERIES |
For the past few years, the State Department of Education’s Special Education Resource Center (SERC) has sponsored a series of workshops on "best practices" for educating children with autism. The target audience consists of educators and parents.
This year’s Focus on Autism series began in October and continues through June. The lectures fall under four groupings: 1) Young Children With Autism; 2) Meeting the Needs of School-age Children with Autism; 3) Especially for Families; and 4) Integrated Skill Building Sessions.
The value of attending some of these workshops will depend on one’s opinion regarding what constitutes "best practices."
One of the more interesting offerings this year is Developing Skills in Practical Discrete Trial Instruction and Programming for Preschoolers With Autism. The presenters are Maria Arnold and Rita Gordon of the Douglass Developmental Disabilities Center at Rutgers University. The training will take place over three Wednesdays (January 24, February 28, and March 28, 2001, from 9:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.) at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) in Hartford. There is no cost, but registration must be received by January 10, 2001.
To obtain registration forms, or for further information about the series, you can call SERC at (860) 632-1485,or visit their web site at www.serc.rh.edu. v
Deborah Fein, Ph.D., and her colleagues at the University of Connecticut (UCONN) and elsewhere, are recruiting participants for several ongoing and upcoming research projects. Fein is a highly regarded diagnostician and researcher who is involved in many projects of potential benefit to our autism community.
Below you will find descriptions of the various projects. For more information, or to express interest, you can write, call, fax, or email Dr. Fein as follows: Deborah Fein, Professor of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-1020; phone 860-486-3518; fax 860-486-2760; deborah.fein@uconn.edu.
1. MRI STUDY OF ATTENTION: We need individuals on the PDD spectrum (adolescents or adults) with relatively high cognitive functioning to participate in a functional MRI study of attention. This study is being conducted at McLean Hospital near Boston, and pays $100.00 for a day’s participation. Participants will be given lots of time to get acclimated and comfortable with the scanner. Actual scanning takes an hour or less.
2. MRI STUDY OF LANGUAGE:
We need individuals on the PDD spectrum (adolescents or adults) with relatively
high cognitive functioning to participate in a functional MRI study of language.
This study is being conducted at the UCONN Medical Center in Farmington and pays
$50.00 for a half-day study. Participants will be given lots of time to get
acclimated and comfortable with the scanner. Actual scanning takes an hour or
less.
3. COMPUTER GAME STUDY OF LANGUAGE: We need individuals on the PDD spectrum with a second grade reading comprehension level to participate in a study of language processing. Participation will involve playing some language computer games and taking some background tests of language and reading level (total time about 2 hours). This can be done in your home, the child’s school, or at UCONN.
4. STUDY OF EYE-BLINK RESPONSE: We need individuals on the PDD spectrum (ages 10-20) for a study of eye-blink response. This study is being conducted at Yale Medical Center and will pay $50.00 for a half-day. The actual study takes about 30 minutes and participants will also take some standardized tests for background.
5. STUDY OF OXYTOCIN: We need individuals on the PDD spectrum (ages 6-11) as well as typically developing children (ages 6-18) - can be friends or neighbors - to investigate oxytocin (a hormone and neurotransmitter) levels; these levels have previously been found to be too low in children with autism. This study will involve a blood draw, to be performed at the UCONN Medical Center in Farmington, as well as some standardized testing and interviewing of parents, and pays $20.00 to parents for travel and a $20.00 gift certificate to a toy store for the child. v
CT FEAT WEB
SITE
Have you checked out the CT FEAT web site (
www.ctfreat.org) lately? If not, you’ll find some new material, including various ABA-related research articles and reports; new links to other recommended web sites; and updated information about ABA professionals available to work in Connecticut.Like everything else CT FEAT does, maintaining and improving the web site is purely the work of dedicated volunteers. If you would like to help in some way, please don’t’ hesitate to contact us! v
Parents Opening
Resource Center
(B.C.)
Longtime parent activists Lois Rosenwald (of the Greater New Haven PDD/Asperger Support Group) and Stacy Hultgren (editor of the PDD Network newsletter) will be the co-directors of the new "Autism Spectrum Resource Center of Connecticut (ASRC)."
The center, which is still under development, is expected to open in February of 2001. It will be located in New Haven.
The ASRC aspires to be Connecticut’s first statewide resource center focused on autism. In addition to creating a library of books, videotapes, educational materials and software, the Center plans to develop various educational, training, and advocacy related programs.
There are lots of ways that you can help the ASRC open its doors - donating items, services, money, or time. Examples of items include computers, printers, VCRs, furniture, and office supplies. Needed services include carpentry, plumbing, and rug installation. You also can make tax deductible donations to help finance the purchase of these goods and services.
Both Rosenwald and Hultgren have excellent track records as people who really get things done. If you can be of help, contact Lois at (203) 272-7529 or Stacy at (203) 924-0457. You also can write to them at: 27 Broadview Road, Cheshire, CT 06410. v
ABA CONFERENCE
IN NEW YORK
The New York State Association for Behavior Analysis (NYSABA) will be holding a one-day workshop, New Directions for Parents and Educators, on Friday, December 15, 2000 at the Crowne Plaza in White Plains, New York. There will be many interesting speakers, including Lovaas colleague Tristam Smith on Intensive behavioral treatment: Implications of recent findings for service providers and families; and Randy Horowitz and Joanne Gerenser on Designing and implementing programming to enhance speech, language and communication skills. Other topics include Fluency and rate in instructional design, Strategies for effective inclusion collaboration, and Quality indicators in ABA services. The cost, with advanced registration by December 5th, is $50.00 for NYSABA members; $70.00 for non-members and $25.00 for nonprofessionals (e.g. parents). For more information, contact Dr. Thomas Zane at
sta@abacuswave.com or visit the NYSABA's web site at www.nysaba.org or call (914) 965-1152. v|
|
CT FEAT PARENT RESOURCE MEETINGS
|
CT FEAT’s quarterly Parent Resource Meetings provide parents with an opportunity to network with each other in a confidential setting. The meetings take place on Sunday afternoons, from 1:30 to 3:30 p.m., at the Rocky Hill Congregational Church on 805 Old Main Street, in Rocky Hill, CT. The first half-hour is dedicated to orienting newcomers. This is followed by a presentation (speaker, video, etc.) or discussion pertaining to treatment or advocacy issues.
The next meeting will take place on Sunday, January 28, 2001. The only requirement for participation is that parents agree to respect each other’s confidentiality. Please visit the CT FEAT web site (
www.ctfeat.org), or call the CT FEAT Hotline (860-571-3888), to request directions, check for storm cancellations, or obtain further information. Also, please note that there is no child care available. v